All three are GFSI-recognized, so the choice usually comes down to which scheme your buyers accept — here is how SQF, BRCGS, and FSSC 22000 differ, and how to confirm the current edition before you build to it.
Do these first
Real help from real food people
Chef Diego runs a real food plant. If this page didn't get you there, tell us — a person reads every message.
After this lesson you can look at SQF, BRCGS, and FSSC 22000 and pick the one to certify to — and know why the pick is usually made for you by a buyer rather than chosen on the merits. Start with the thing that makes the three substitutable.
does not run an audit or issue a certificate. It recognizes schemes. SQF, BRCGS, and FSSC 22000 are three of the roughly one dozen schemes it currently recognizes, and for a US food manufacturer they are the three you will actually run into. If the benchmark-versus- certificate distinction is new to you, the earlier lesson on whether you need GFSI at all works through it.
Because all three are recognized against the same benchmark, they are interchangeable in exactly one sense: a buyer who asks for "GFSI certification" with no scheme named will accept any of them. That is the whole value of the benchmark — certified once against a recognized scheme, accepted by every buyer that trusts the benchmark.
So the choice is often not yours to make on the merits. If a buyer names a scheme in their supplier requirements — "must be SQF certified," "we require BRCGS" — that is the scheme, and certifying to a different recognized scheme does not satisfy a requirement that names a specific one. The choice is genuinely open only when a buyer asks for "any GFSI-recognized certificate," or when you are certifying ahead of a named account. Then the differences below decide it.
All three sit on the same foundation — a food-safety management system built on , prerequisite programs, and third-party verification. But they come from different places and feel different to run.
SQF (Safe Quality Food) is administered by the SQF Institute, a division of FMI — The Food Industry Association, the North American trade association for food retailers and wholesalers. That lineage — a scheme that comes from the retailers' own trade body — is why SQF is so widely accepted by North American grocery retailers. It publishes sector-specific codes: a food manufacturer certifies to the Food Manufacturing code, a warehouse to Storage and Distribution, and so on, so you build to the code that matches what you actually do. SQF also splits food safety and quality into two separate codes. The Food Safety Code is what most buyers mean when they say "SQF certified"; a separate Quality Code layers product-quality management on top for sites that want it, and you certify to the Food Safety Code first.
BRCGS (Brand Reputation through Compliance Global Standards) began as the British Retail Consortium's food-safety standard and has been revised for more than 25 years. It is used by more than 22,000 sites across over 130 countries and is widely required by UK and European retailers. Its character is detailed and prescriptive — the code spells its requirements out tightly — and its audit produces a letter grade rather than a plain pass, with both announced and unannounced audit options. If your buyers are British or European retailers, or you export into those markets, BRCGS is often the scheme named.
FSSC 22000 is built on , plus sector-specific from the ISO 22002 series, plus a set of additional FSSC requirements on top. Because its base is ISO, it fits naturally into an operation that already runs other ISO management systems, and it is used widely across international manufacturers. If your buyers or your parent company already speak ISO, FSSC 22000 tends to be the least friction.
Here is the part that trips up first-timers, and the one place you must not trust a number you remember — not even one you read six months ago. Each scheme publishes its code in numbered editions or versions and revises them on its own schedule, and right now all three are mid-motion:
Confirm the current edition at the scheme owner's own site
Before you build a system to any of these codes, open the scheme owner's own site — sqfi.com, brcgs.com, or fssc.com — and confirm which edition or version is currently in effect for certification, for your product sector. The numbers above are accurate as of the date on this lesson and will move. Certifying to a superseded edition is wasted work.
None of these three schemes audits you. Each scheme owner writes and maintains the code; the audit itself is done by a . You choose your CB from the ones licensed for the scheme you picked, and a single CB is usually licensed for more than one scheme.
This matters for two reasons. First, the CB — not the scheme owner — sets your audit fee, your dates, and your auditor, so once you know your scheme, getting quotes from more than one licensed CB is the real next move; fees vary by site size, product risk, and CB, so treat any number you remember as wrong until a CB quotes your site. Second, the CB has to be licensed and accredited for your exact scheme and product scope — confirm that before you sign, not after.
Put it together as a short sequence.
Read what your buyers require
Start from the supplier requirements of the buyers you have and the ones you want. If one names a scheme, that is your scheme. If more than one names a scheme, look for the one they share.
Match the code to your sector
Once you have a scheme, confirm it publishes a code that fits what you actually make — food manufacturing, storage and distribution, packaging, and so on. You certify to the code for your sector, not to the scheme in the abstract.
Confirm the current edition, then quote it out
Confirm the effective edition or version at the scheme owner's site, then request quotes from at least two certification bodies licensed for that scheme and scope.
Choosing the scheme is the easy half. The harder half is running it day to day — and SQF in particular names a specific person who must own the system on site. Who that person is, what they have to be able to do, and the mistakes first-timers make filling the role are the next lesson.
Do this in your operation